<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Negative Gamer</title>
	
	<link>http://negativegamer.com</link>
	<description>because the games we love could be better</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 21:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/NegativeGamer" type="application/rss+xml" /><feedburner:emailServiceId xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0">2447988</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0">http://www.feedburner.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><item>
		<title>Once You Go HD, You Don’t Go Back</title>
		<link>http://negativegamer.com/2009/01/06/once-you-go-hd-you-dont-go-back/</link>
		<comments>http://negativegamer.com/2009/01/06/once-you-go-hd-you-dont-go-back/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 21:43:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Halfleft</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[HD]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[sound]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[surround]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://negativegamer.com/?p=574</guid>
		<description>I recently bought some 5.1 over the ear headphones to use for gaming and it got me doing some reflective thinking.
I remember the first time I played a console videogame on a HD television (PC gaming is another matter altogether). It was Gears of War. I was playing it on a poorly wall mounted 32&amp;#8243; [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NegativeGamer/~4/504666997" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://negativegamer.com/2009/01/06/once-you-go-hd-you-dont-go-back/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Learn, Or Re-Learn, How To Comment On Negative Gamer</title>
		<link>http://negativegamer.com/2009/01/06/learn-or-re-learn-how-to-comment-on-negative-gamer/</link>
		<comments>http://negativegamer.com/2009/01/06/learn-or-re-learn-how-to-comment-on-negative-gamer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 21:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wardrox</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Rant]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Kotaku]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://negativegamer.com/?p=581</guid>
		<description>[Any similarity between this post and one from earlier today on Kotaku is purely coincidental]
Why, hello there. It&amp;#8217;s that time again, time to remind seasoned vets and newcomers alike how to comment right here on Negative Gamer. Things to keep in mind:
We banned a guy. Once. One time I did it. And that&amp;#8217;s not all! [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NegativeGamer/~4/504638406" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://negativegamer.com/2009/01/06/learn-or-re-learn-how-to-comment-on-negative-gamer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Co-op Gaming: Methods To The Madness</title>
		<link>http://negativegamer.com/2009/01/06/co-op-gaming-methods-to-the-madness/</link>
		<comments>http://negativegamer.com/2009/01/06/co-op-gaming-methods-to-the-madness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 11:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Genfuyung</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Army of Two]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[co-op]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Halo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://negativegamer.com/?p=568</guid>
		<description>Co-op is one of the best features currently being used in gaming. There is no better feeling than running around with a buddy and relying on each other to beat a level or a boss. This generation of consoles has seen the most co-op games since the SNES. Some of these games have come close [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NegativeGamer/~4/504227621" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://negativegamer.com/2009/01/06/co-op-gaming-methods-to-the-madness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Things We Hate About Gaming: Real Life Meetups</title>
		<link>http://negativegamer.com/2009/01/05/what-i-hate-about-gaming-real-life-meetups/</link>
		<comments>http://negativegamer.com/2009/01/05/what-i-hate-about-gaming-real-life-meetups/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 22:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nerdfit</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[TWHAG]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://negativegamer.com/?p=528</guid>
		<description>Imagine if you will: For the past month you have been playing Halo 3 on the Xbox 360 with a female &amp;#8220;internet friend&amp;#8221; you met while playing. Her gamertag &amp;#8220;Foxylady69.&amp;#8221; You both have gotten to know each other and decide to meet up in real life. Your mental image of her ranks an 8 on [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NegativeGamer/~4/503756357" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://negativegamer.com/2009/01/05/what-i-hate-about-gaming-real-life-meetups/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GameStop Catering to Wimmenz…Again</title>
		<link>http://negativegamer.com/2009/01/05/gamestop-catering-to-wimmenzagain/</link>
		<comments>http://negativegamer.com/2009/01/05/gamestop-catering-to-wimmenzagain/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 21:06:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rampancy</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[gamestop]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ridiculosity]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://negativegamer.com/?p=576</guid>
		<description>GameStop will now be offering year subscriptions to ridiculously boring magazines such as Cosmopolitan, Redbook, Good Housekeeping, and O Magazine. But wait, there&amp;#8217;s more! I know you&amp;#8217;re already rushing away from your computer to get your fill of sex tips, how to starve yourself, and how to please your man. Please contain yourselves for the [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NegativeGamer/~4/503707434" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://negativegamer.com/2009/01/05/gamestop-catering-to-wimmenzagain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Valuing Your Talent in The New Year</title>
		<link>http://negativegamer.com/2009/01/05/valuing-your-talent-in-the-new-year/</link>
		<comments>http://negativegamer.com/2009/01/05/valuing-your-talent-in-the-new-year/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 19:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CameronS</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Kotaku]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Leigh Alexander]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[PR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://negativegamer.com/?p=575</guid>
		<description>[Cameron read an article on Kotaku titled "New Year's Resolutions For The Game Industry" by Leigh Alexander. Among the many points argued, she calls for more recognition of the people who actually make the games - Ed]
Among the resolutions Ms. Alexander discussed, the ever so hopeful &amp;#8220;Value Your Talent&amp;#8221; section caught my eye. I&amp;#8217;ll just [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NegativeGamer/~4/503620795" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://negativegamer.com/2009/01/05/valuing-your-talent-in-the-new-year/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Five Most Negative Supporting Characters</title>
		<link>http://negativegamer.com/2009/01/05/five-most-negative-supporting-characters/</link>
		<comments>http://negativegamer.com/2009/01/05/five-most-negative-supporting-characters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 13:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Halfleft</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Add new tag]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Cortana]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Devil May Cry 4]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Dom]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Final Fantasy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Gear of War]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[GTA]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Halo 3]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Kyrie]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Payne]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Sonic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://negativegamer.com/?p=559</guid>
		<description>When we play our games we often have one or more supporting characters following us around giving us advice and aiding us in our quest/mission/attack. More often than not these characters are assigned personalities to make them feel more human. I thought that it would cheer us all up to think about some of the [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NegativeGamer/~4/503386610" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://negativegamer.com/2009/01/05/five-most-negative-supporting-characters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Your Kid Can’t Talk? Blame TV &amp; Videogames Apparently</title>
		<link>http://negativegamer.com/2009/01/04/your-kid-cant-talk-blame-tv-videogames-apparently/</link>
		<comments>http://negativegamer.com/2009/01/04/your-kid-cant-talk-blame-tv-videogames-apparently/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 18:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark "junglistgamer"</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[propaganda]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Telegraph]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://negativegamer.com/?p=565</guid>
		<description>Britain&amp;#8217;s most irrelevant major newspaper The Telegraph has delivered a particularly mindless piece of anti videogame propaganda. The report concerns a disturbing announcement by Conservative MP John Bercow that the language skills of children can be dangerously underdeveloped. I&amp;#8217;m no fan of the Tories but Mr Bercow definitely makes some important points. He includes excessive gaming [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NegativeGamer/~4/502687541" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://negativegamer.com/2009/01/04/your-kid-cant-talk-blame-tv-videogames-apparently/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wardrox’s Video Video Game Blog - Sun 4th Jan</title>
		<link>http://negativegamer.com/2009/01/04/wardroxs-video-video-game-blog-sun-4th-jan/</link>
		<comments>http://negativegamer.com/2009/01/04/wardroxs-video-video-game-blog-sun-4th-jan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 13:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wardrox</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Misc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://negativegamer.com/?p=569</guid>
		<description>I thought it might be quite nice for me to have a weekly-ish video blog. If it&amp;#8217;s good enough for David Jaffe, it&amp;#8217;s good enough for me. So, starting today, roughly once a week I&amp;#8217;ll post a short video filled with me talking about crap you may not care about.
Hopefully one day I&amp;#8217;ll say something [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NegativeGamer/~4/502517268" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://negativegamer.com/2009/01/04/wardroxs-video-video-game-blog-sun-4th-jan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review Symposium: Review Scores (Part 3, Response)</title>
		<link>http://negativegamer.com/2009/01/03/review-symposium-review-scores-part-3-response-ed-post-2nd/</link>
		<comments>http://negativegamer.com/2009/01/03/review-symposium-review-scores-part-3-response-ed-post-2nd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 21:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wardrox</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Gerstmann]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[N'Gai Croal]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Review Symposium]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Shawn Elliott]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[symposium]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://negativegamer.com/?p=534</guid>
		<description>As I said a few weeks ago, this Review Symposium will either be very important for videogame journalism, or a bit of a &amp;#8220;self-obsessed literature fart&amp;#8221;. So far, and we have only seen one topic discussed, it&amp;#8217;s been around 50/50.
The first topic discussed was that of giving a numerical score to a review. I recapped [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NegativeGamer/~4/502049349" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://negativegamer.com/2009/01/03/review-symposium-review-scores-part-3-response-ed-post-2nd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss><!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.316 seconds -->
